String Quartet, trio, duo or solo?
This is a question I often get asked for weddings, but also private parties.
We have just made a promo video which is currently being edited and should be on the site and Youtube soon which has all these combinations to help anyone decide.
In general, I'd say -
- If budget is not an issue, go for
string quartet. There is more music available, it makes the most complete sound, and it looks right.
- If music is purely background and more for the nice spectacle and atmosphere, then trio is fine.
String trio will often use the best quartet music with a part left out. This missing part is not always essential, and there is a lovely sound still from a trio.
- If you want a less expensive option,
string duo is fine. It is more effective for intimate occasions - ie small, low-key weddings, private birthday or dinner parties, etc. The sound is a bit thin, but still pleasant. It has an intimacy that makes up in part for the smaller sound.
- If you want to be a bit different,
solo string player is a nice idea. Fewer people book them, but solo violin or solo cello are effective. They're not quite as good for famous songs. Whilst you could play 'Every Breath You Take' for string quartet or even trio, it would sound wrong on solo violin or solo cello. I personally prefer solo cello, (even though I'm a violinist!) - but there is a romance in solo violin, and I've spoken to quite a few brides who are somewhat in love with the idea.
Whatever your thoughts, please feel free to let me know any ideas of unusual music that appeals to you - I'm always interested in new ideas for live event music.
